Let’s return  to the topic of the close circle of Deputy Mayor of Moscow Sergei Sobyanin, Natalya Sergunina, who is responsible for the economy and management of city property. She prohibited posting any information about her personal life (including her date of birth) on government websites, which aroused suspicion that the official had something to hide. And so it turned out. As we managed to find out, Sergunina’s common-law husband and the father of her daughter is a native of Chechnya, Movladi Natsaev, who in 2000, shortly before meeting Natalya, was entered into the database of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation in Moscow as a criminal contingent. As Sergunina’s career grew, Movladi’s well-being grew noticeably. He especially loves collecting “expensive” Mercedes. Two of Natsaev’s cars have license plates K979RA197 and K939RA197. The three letters “KRA” are well known to every Chechen. They stand for Ramzan Akhmatovich Kadyrov. And if an ordinary Chechen puts a similar number on his Priora, he will be in big trouble. Only a select few can use such numbers—those who are close to the head of Chechnya.

Therefore, one should not be surprised that guests of Moscow from Chechnya felt more than at ease in the capital. Suffice it to recall these constant stories of shootings during weddings and other significant events.

In the fall of 2012, after another shooting scandal, Sobyanin decided to speak out on this issue. The mayor of Moscow took the situation surrounding the shooting personally and promised to “rigidly suppress any such actions in the future.” By the way, the participant in the shooting, after which Sobyanin made his statement, received 15 days of arrest.

And in April 2013, according to our data, an event occurred, information about which was not included in the media. Which is not surprising. After all, its main participant was the common-law husband of Sobyanin’s subordinate Natalya Sergunina (by the way, she is officially listed as unmarried) Movladi Natsayev. He started a shooting in Moscow: first from a balcony, and then at the entrance of a residential building. This happened in the morning, when the area was full of children and passers-by. Now guess what “severe” punishment the deputy mayor’s relative received? Let’s not torment readers any longer - a fine of 3,000 rubles. And that’s because people called the police and it was impossible to “hush up” the story. Do you know what was the main mitigating circumstance when sentencing?

“Being a dependent of a minor child born in 2003.” We are talking about his daughter together with Sergunina. In order not to be unfounded, we publish excerpts of the court decision regarding Natsaev.

“Case No. 5-58/2013

P O S T A N O V L E N I E

May 16, 2013                                                                                                                     Moscow

Magistrate of the judicial district No. 348 of the Savyolovsky district of Moscow Ivanova M.A....

Installation:

Natsaev M.A. committed an administrative offense under Art. 20.13 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences: shooting from weapons in places not designated for this purpose.

So Natsaev M.A., May 16, 2013 at approximately 09:50 a.m., located at the address: Moscow, st. Novopeschanaya, **, apt. ****, fired from a self-defense weapon belonging to him in a populated area in places not designated for this purpose, namely: from the window of the specified apartment.

Natsaev M.A. appeared at the court hearing, fully admitted his guilt, repented of his deeds, explained that on May 16, 2013, while at home at the address: Moscow, st. Novopeschanaya, **, apt. ** from the window of the apartment, fired two shots from a traumatic pistol of the brand "*******" No. *******, and several shots on the street near the entrance of his house. He also has a traumatic pistol named “******” No. *******.

Vina Natsaeva M.A. is also confirmed by written materials of the case:

- protocol of the CAO No. ******** on an administrative offense dated May 16, 2013, from which it follows that Natsaev M.A. May 16, 2013 at approximately 09:50 a.m., located at the address: Moscow, st. Novopeschanaya, **, apt. **, fired from a self-defense weapon belonging to him in a populated area in places not designated for this purpose, namely: from the window of the specified apartment;

- a report from the inspector of the PPSP company of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Sokol district of Moscow, senior police lieutenant V.V. Safonov;

- SAO protocol No. ******** on administrative detention dated May 16, 2013. in relation to Natsaev M.A., who committed an administrative offense on May 16, 2013;

- medical examination protocol No. ****** dated May 16, 2013, according to which, based on the results of the examination, Natsaev M.A. the state of alcoholic intoxication was established;

- protocol of seizure of (sealed) firearms and ammunition dated May 16, 2013, from which it follows that Natsaev M.A. A traumatic pistol, g/p "*******" No. *******, 10 cartridges was seized. caliber 9 mm, the protocol was drawn up in the presence of two witnesses: M., A.

- I.’s explanations dated May 16, 2013, according to which, on May 16, 2013. at approximately 09.00, I. parked his car at the address: Moscow, st. Novopeschanaya, 7, heard shots, he saw a man about 185 cm tall, with dark hair, in a light T-shirt and trousers, who was holding an object that looked like a pistol in his hand. There were approximately 6-8 shots, then this man entered entrance No. 1, house No. ** on the street. Novopeschanaya, Moscow;

- B.’s explanations dated May 16, 2013, according to which, on May 16, 2013. at approximately 09.00, she was at home at her place of residence at the address: Moscow, st. Novopeschanaya, **, apt. **. When she heard shots, she went out onto the balcony and saw a man standing near the entrance, later she found out that it was her neighbor from apartment No. **, he was holding an object in his hands that looked like a pistol, she heard about 7-8 shots;

- an act of voluntary extradition dated May 16, 2013, according to which, in the presence of witnesses: L. and B.N., he issued a traumatic pistol “*******” No. ******.

The court has no reason not to trust the presented materials of the case...When imposing a punishment in accordance with Art. 4.1.-4.3. Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, the court takes into account the nature and circumstances of the commission of the administrative offense, information about the identity of the perpetrator, who has not previously been brought to administrative responsibility, fully admitted his guilt and sincerely repented of his actions, being a dependent minor child born in 2003, which the court recognizes in There are no aggravating circumstances as mitigating circumstances.

P o st a n o v i l:

Recognize Natsaev M.A. guilty of committing an administrative offense under Art. 20.13 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, and impose a fine on him in the amount of 3,000 (Three thousand) rubles to the state’s income.”

——————

What would a normal and decent vice-mayor do after such a story? I would have submitted my resignation the very next day. But, of course, such a move is not for Natalya Sergunina. Especially in conditions when she has so many obligations to other people from her environment. But we’ll talk about this another time.